Recently in financial Category

Under new regulations adopted by the Federal Trade Commission today, for-profit debt settlement companies will no longer be allowed to collect fees for their services until they have settled some or all of a consumer's debt.  The new regulations will help curb deceptive and abusive practices in debt relief services sold through telemarketing, according to Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports. 

"Most debt settlement companies charge big fees up front even though most consumers don't get the help they expect," said Lauren Bowne, Staff Attorney for Consumers Union's Defend Your Dollars campaign (www.DefendYourDollars.org)  "These new rules will help protect consumers who are already drowning in debt from being ripped off by debt settlement companies that fail to provide any relief.  But more needs to be done to ensure that the amount of fees charged for debt settlement services are fair."  

Most debt settlement companies market their services through Internet, television, or radio advertising.  The advertisements typically promise to substantially reduce debt and urge consumers to call a toll-free number to find out more.  Once the consumer signs up, the debt settlement company takes its fees over the first half of the contract period.  The FTC reports that nearly two-thirds of consumers who enroll in debt relief services, most of which pay an advance fee, end up dropping out of the programs within the first three years without getting the help they paid to receive.    

Debt settlement companies usually advise consumers to stop paying their creditors and to instead set up a special account to build savings that will be used in the future to negotiate a settlement.  As the consumer deposits savings into the account, the debt settlement company withdraws money to cover its fees even though it hasn't reached a settlement with creditors.  By stopping payments to creditors, the consumer ends up with a worse credit score, additional penalty fees and more interest charges.  

While debt settlement companies claim they settle millions of dollars in debt for consumers, they have not revealed how much debt remains unsettled.  The Better Business Bureau announced that it would stop calling debt settlement services "inherently problematic" if a company could show that it met several conditions, key among them that at least one half of its customers saved as much money as was paid in fees.  The GAO reported in April 2010 that two debt settlement trade associations called that standard "unrealistic."

The FTC's new regulation banning advance fees will go into effect on October 27, 2010 and takes a key step forward by addressing the timing of the fees.  Under the new rules, a debt settlement company will earn fees when it reaches a settlement on at least one of the consumer's debts that the consumer agrees to in writing.  Fees cannot be collected until the consumer has made at least one payment to the creditor as a result of the negotiated agreement.  

Fees can be held in a dedicated account before that time but all unearned fees must be returned to the consumer if he or she decides that the debt settlement program is not working out or cancels the program.  Debt settlement firms can only require a dedicated account under certain conditions, including that the account must be set up and maintained by the consumer at an insured financial institution.  The consumer will be entitled to earn interest on the account and can withdraw the funds at any time without penalty.  

Beginning on September 27, 2010, the FTC rule requires that debt settlement companies make certain pre-contract disclosures, including how long it will take to get results and how much it will cost.  The new rules cover calls consumers make to debt settlement firms in response to advertising as well as telemarketing calls made by firms.  However, the FTC's new regulation does not apply to in-person sales or to Internet-only sales, so Congress or the states will have to act to apply the new rules to those debt settlement contracts.  

"The FTC regulations will ensure that debt settlement companies will only get paid if they help consumers but it doesn't stop them from charging outrageously high fees," said Bowne.  "Now it's up to state lawmakers or Congress to cap debt settlement fees to a reasonable percentage of the actual savings for consumers."  

Two federal bills (S. 3264 and HR 5387) have been introduced in Congress to limit debt settlement fees to a one-time $50 fee and five percent of the savings from each final settlement.

A former political fundraiser, Hassan Nemazee, was sentenced today in federal court in Manhattan to 144 months in prison for defrauding Bank of America, N.A. (BofA), Citibank, N.A., and HSBC Bank USA N.A. out of $292 million in loan proceeds, announced U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara and the FBI's New York Office Acting Assistant Director-in-Charge George Venizelos. In addition to the prison term, U.S. District Judge Sidney H. Stein ordered Nemazee to pay restitution of more than $292 million to the defrauded banks; to forfeit various real properties, corporate entities, hedge funds, securities accounts and bank accounts; and to serve three years of supervised release.

According to the superseding information to which Nemazee pleaded guilty, documents filed in court, and statements made during the guilty plea and sentencing proceedings, from 1998 to 2009, Nemazee obtained hundreds of millions of dollars in loans from BofA, Citibank, and HSBC. To obtain the loans, Nemazee misrepresented to the banks that he owned hundreds of millions of dollars in collateral, in the form of securities and other assets, which he did not own. In fact, Nemazee used fake documents, including bogus account statements, to show his supposed ownership of the collateral. The documents also contained forged signatures of persons associated with Westminster Securities Corporation, the brokerage firm at which Nemazee claimed to hold these assets, as well as Westminster's clearing firm, Pershing LLC.

The fake account statements and other documents that Nemazee provided also contained telephone numbers, supposedly for Westminster and Pershing, which were in fact assigned to "virtual offices" that Nemazee himself had established or to a cell phone that Nemazee himself had obtained. Nemazee created at least two "virtual offices" in Manhattan that held themselves out, at his direction, as being associated with Westminster and Pershing.

One of the loans from BofA, a $100 million line of credit, was guaranteed by Nemazee's longtime friend and business associate, who pledged a multi-million dollar home in Colorado as collateral on the loan, not knowing that the collateral that Nemazee was pledging did not exist. As of August 2009, Nemazee owed approximately $142 million to BofA and $74.9 million to Citibank.

In August 2009 - when Citibank began to ask questions in order to verify the existence of the purported collateral that Nemazee had pledged for the Citibank loan, and after special agents of the FBI had interviewed Nemazee about the Citibank loan - Nemazee drew down on a line of credit that he had fraudulently obtained from HSBC earlier in 2009 and used those funds to pay Citibank the $74.9 million that he owed.

Nemazee was able to continue the fraud for longer than a decade by, among other things, making partial repayments on his borrowings from BofA with proceeds of his fraud on Citibank and making partial repayments on his borrowings from Citibank with proceeds of his fraud on BofA.

Nemazee used the proceeds of his fraudulent schemes to, among other things: purchase an apartment and land in Italy; make monthly maintenance payments on a Park Avenue apartment; pay for the upkeep of a 12-acre property in Katonah, N.Y.; purchase partial interests in a private plane and a luxury yacht; make personal donations to the election campaigns of federal, state and local candidates, political action committees, and charities; and make various other investments.

Nemazee also used his political donations to enhance his reputation and standing in political circles. In 2009, Nemazee unsuccessfully attempted to capitalize on that standing by seeking nomination to a Cabinet-level position, all the while engaged in the fraud for which he was sentenced. Nemazee had previously been nominated as U.S. Ambassador to Argentina in 1999, but his nomination was withdrawn.

Nemazee, 60, of Manhattan, was ordered to surrender on Aug. 27, 2010.

Nemazee's brother-in-law, Shahin Kashanchi, 47, of Telluride, Colo., is separately charged in an indictment with aiding and abetting Nemazee's bank fraud by manufacturing the fake account statements and other documents that Nemazee used to defraud BofA, Citibank and HSBC. Kashanchi's case is pending in Manhattan federal court. The charge and allegations contained in the indictment charging Kashanchi are merely accusations, and Kashanchi is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

U.S. Attorney Bharara praised the investigative work of the FBI. U.S. Attorney Bharara also thanked BofA, Citibank, HSBC, and Pershing for their assistance in the investigation.

"For over a decade, Hassan Nemazee authored a fantastic fiction, stealing $292 million by acting the part of wealthy and influential power broker," said U.S. Attorney Bharara. "In the end, justice is blind to political affiliations and powerful connections, and today, like any other defendant, Nemazee faces the stark consequences of his decision to violate the law."

"Nemazee lived like a prince, with palatial properties on two continents," said FBI New York office Acting Assistant Director-in-Charge Venizelos. "But he financed this lavish lifestyle with hundreds of millions in fraudulently obtained loans, so his empire was really a house of cards. The FBI remains determined to stop those who steal from banks through deceit and trickery."

This case was brought in coordination with President Barack Obama's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, on which U.S. Attorney Bharara serves as a Co-Chair of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

The case is being handled by the U.S. Attorney's Office's Complex Frauds and Asset Forfeiture Units.

Thomas Joseph Petters, age 52, of Wayzata, Minn., has been sentenced to 50 years in federal prison for orchestrating a $3.7 billion Ponzi scheme. The sentence, imposed by U.S. District Court Judge Richard H. Kyle earlier this morning in St. Paul, Minn., represents the longest term of imprisonment ever ordered in a financial fraud case in Minnesota history. In ordering the prison term, Judge Kyle said, "I'm not satisfied that if he were released early, he wouldn't re-offend."

Following a month-long trial, Petters was convicted on Dec. 2, 2009, of 10 counts of wire fraud, three counts of mail fraud, one count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, and five counts of money laundering. Today, while referring to the lack of believability in Petters' trial testimony, Judge Kyle said, "It just didn't pass the smell test."

After the sentencing, U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones said, "For years Tom Petters built his life on the shattered dreams of others. Minnesotans need to be reminded there are thousands of entrepreneurs in our state who are grounded in community values, give generously to charity, act as true mentors to other business people, are ethical stewards of investors and grow good jobs. They are not Tom Petters. Tom Petters is a fraud, and now he will pay a huge price for his self-enrichment and his deceit. The sentence imposed today by the court and the tremendous efforts made by an outstanding prosecution team in presenting this case to a jury should send a strong message to others that we in the Department of Justice are committed to investigating and vigorously prosecuting those who commit financial crimes, particularly during these tough economic times."

Ralph S. Boelter, Special Agent in Charge of the Minneapolis field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, added, "It is my hope that this day will mark the start of a recovery process of sorts for all those victimized by Tom Petters, and that his sentence, appropriate for the crimes committed, will serve an effective deterrent to those similarly inclined."

According to the evidence presented at trial, Petters, assisted by others, defrauded and obtained billions of dollars in money and property by inducing investors to provide Petters Company, Inc., (PCI) funds to purchase merchandise that was to be resold to retailers at a profit. However, no such purchases were made. Instead, the defendants and co-conspirators diverted the funds for other purposes, such as making lulling payments to investors, paying off those who assisted in the fraud scheme, funding businesses owned or controlled by the defendants and financing Tom Petters' extravagant lifestyle.

"In simplest terms, promoters of Ponzi schemes prey upon trusting investors and then steal their hared-earned money," said Julio LaRosa, Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) - Criminal Investigation Division. "This case was a blatant example of this type of fraud, and the IRS - Criminal Investigation Division, along with its law enforcement partners, worked diligently to get to the facts behind the facade and ensure that those responsible face the punishment they brought on themselves for the devastation they caused in the lives of so many."

The investigation of this case began on Sept. 8, 2008, when co-conspirator Deanna Coleman and her attorney reported to authorities that she had been assisting Petters in executing a multi-billion-dollar Ponzi scheme over the previous 10 years. Coleman claimed she, Petters and co-conspirator Robert White had fabricated business documents to entice investors into lending Petters money purportedly to buy electronic goods to be sold to big-box retailers, such as Costco and Sam's Club.

Coleman subsequently agreed to work with law enforcement. She wore a recording device to tape conversations with Petters and others to substantiate her claims as well as White and Petters' involvement in the fraud. Within the first few hours of Coleman's recorded conversations, Petters was heard admitting that purchase orders were "fake" and claiming "divine intervention" was the only explanation for how he and his co-conspirators "could have got away with this for so long." Those recorded conversations chronicled the history of the scheme as well as the conspirators' efforts to maintain it by obtaining new investor funds and lulling long-term investors. The recordings also detailed how the conspirators planned to avoid responsibility if the fraud was discovered.

On September 24, 2008, agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division; and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service executed search warrants at Petters' headquarters, Petters' home, and other locations. They recovered numerous documents and evidence. Within days, PCI filed for bankruptcy. On October 3, Petters was arrested and detained after authorities learned he had been discussing fleeing the jurisdiction. He has been in custody since that time. His indictment on these charges occurred in December of 2008.

Shawn S. Tiller, Postal Inspector in Charge of the Denver Division, which includes the Twin Cities, said, "The sentencing today of Tom Petters in this $3.7 billion Ponzi scheme is reassurance that the U.S. Attorney's Office and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service will remain at the forefront of investigating cases like these, where the trust and confidence of the American public has been violated through the criminal misuse of the U.S. mail. As long as there are individuals such as Petters and those associated with his company, PCI, who continue to misuse the U.S. mail to steal the hard-earned money of investors and ruin their hopes and dreams of a secure financial future, postal inspectors will be there to ensure that justice is served."

Through Petters' scam, potential investors were provided fabricated documents that listed goods purportedly purchased by PCI from various vendors and then sold to retailers. In some instances, investors also were provided false records indicating that PCI had wired its own funds to vendors, thus giving the appearance that PCI had money invested in the deals too. In addition, investors frequently received false PCI financial statements showing the company was owed billions of dollars from retailers. To induce investors further, Petters often signed promissory notes and provided his personal guarantee for the funds received. Those who invested, however, were not paid through profits from actual transactions. Rather, they were paid with money obtained from subsequent investors and, sometimes, even their own money. PCI, which was formed in 1994, was solely owned by Petters and was used for fraudulent purposes from the start. Petters inflated and falsified purchase orders in an effort to obtain more money from investors, which, in turn, he used to pay other investors as well as his increasingly lavish personal lifestyle. When Petters could not pay an investor on time, he employed delay and evasion tactics, such as promising payment in the near future, making up excuses about slow payments from retailers, or providing checks that bounced. As the scheme progressed, Coleman, who was hired by Petters as an office manager in 1993, began fabricating PCI purchase orders and transferring funds between investors. In 1999, Petters wanted to give investors false bank statements to "verify" PCI's purported bank transactions with retailers. Therefore, Petters turned to White, his friend, who agreed to prepare the fraudulent documents. Afterward, Petters hired White and gave him the title of chief financial officer of PCI. Among other things, White was responsible for fabricating retailer purchase orders and PCI financial records. To further his scheme, Petters recruited purported vendors to assist him. In 2001, he asked business associates Larry Reynolds and Michael Catain to launder billions of dollars of investor funds through their business accounts and back to Petters and PCI. Reynolds operated Nationwide International Resources, Inc. (NIR) and previously had conducted deals involving shoes and clothing with retailers, including Petters. In 2001, Petters asked Reynolds to allow him to wire money through Reynolds's bank accounts in exchange for a percentage of the funds in "commission." Petters made a similar agreement with Catain. As a result, in early 2002, Catain created a sham company, Enchanted Family Buying Co. (EFBC), and opened a business bank account. He then directed funds from Petters through that business account and back to Petters and PCI, less a commission. EFBC did no real business. In fact, its headquarters was above Catain's car wash, just a few miles from Petters' headquarters. Between January 2003 and September 2008, approximately $12 billion flowed through the NIR account into the PCI account. During that same time period, roughly the same amount flowed through the EFBC account into PCI. Although each company was purportedly a vendor, selling hundreds of millions of dollars in merchandise, bank records revealed no vendor income from those transactions. Instead, money only flowed one way - from the companies to PCI. In April of 2001, PCI opened a new bank account that only Petters and Coleman were authorized to use. From January 2003 to September 2008, approximately $35 billion was wired into that account from investors, NIR, and EFBC. Although PCI supposedly was selling merchandise to retailers, none of the deposits into the account came from retailers. Moreover, while some funds in the account went to pay investors, other money from the account was used for bonuses for Petters' employees, most of whom did not even work for PCI. In addition, hundreds of millions of dollars went to fund Petters' companies, including Petters Warehouse Direct and RedTag. Petters also used PCI funds to employ family members, purchase real estate for family members, and fund businesses for them. Finally, millions went to Coleman and White, while Petters himself received tens of millions in account dollars. Petters continued to purchase and operate companies in an effort to maintain the facade of a successful businessman and create a false air of legitimacy that would lure new investors. The companies he bought were purchased with proceeds of the PCI fraud, and they included Fingerhut, Polaroid, and Sun Country Airlines, which, collectively, became known as Petters Group Worldwide, or PGW. Each year PCI wrote off millions of dollars in losses based on the losses it incurred from funding these other companies. However, the companies provided Petters the appearance he needed to keep the scam going. By the end of 2007, the conspirators were struggling to find new investors, and PCI was slow to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in promissory notes held by Lancelot Investment Management, which was operated by Greg Bell. Petters told Bell the slow payments were due to his retailers, who were late in paying him. As a result, Bell agreed to an extension on the payments so the notes would not go into default. In February 2008, Bell and Petters agreed Bell would receive replacement purchase orders from other retailers for the purported purchase orders held by Lancelot. Bell suggested they also exchange money so it would appear that PCI was paying its notes. Between late February 2008 and the date of the search warrants, Bell and Petters engaged in more than 80 "round trip" financial transactions intended to give the false impression that PCI was paying its obligations when due. Petters continued to lull investors even after law enforcement executed search warrants on September 24, 2008. Furthermore, on October 1, 2008, Petters suggested to White and Reynolds that they flee prior to prosecution. Coleman, White, Reynolds, Catain, and Bell already have pleaded guilty for their roles in the scheme. Sentencing dates for them, however, have not been scheduled. James Wemhoff, Petters' personal and business accountant, has pled guilty to criminal charges not related to the PCI Ponzi scheme. He has not been sentenced either. This case was the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the IRS-Criminal Investigation Division, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. It was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joseph T. Dixon, John R. Marti, Timothy C. Rank, and John F. Docherty.

United Security Bancshares, Inc. (Nasdaq: USBI) today announced that, along with its banking subsidiary First United Security Bank and Acceptance Loan Company, Inc., a finance company operated by the bank (collectively referred to as the "USB Companies"), it has entered into a settlement agreement to resolve all claims alleged against the defendants named in the lawsuit styled Acceptance Loan Company Inc., First United Security Bank and United Security Bancshares, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al., filed in the Circuit Court of Clarke County, Alabama on December 18, 2009, Case No. 16-CV-2009-900168.00.

The USB Companies filed the lawsuit to seek recovery under a fidelity insurance policy and bond issued by The Cincinnati Insurance Company, which policy provides coverage for losses due to the dishonest or fraudulent conduct of employees of the USB Companies.  Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. originally submitted a claim under the policy in connection with the loan irregularities discovered during the second quarter of 2007 resulting from the fraudulent conduct of certain ALC employees.

Pursuant to the settlement agreement, The Cincinnati Insurance Company agreed to pay to the USB Companies the sum of $4,150,000.  In exchange, the USB Companies agreed to dismiss, with prejudice, each of the defendants from the lawsuit and to release the defendants from all claims asserted or that may have been asserted against the defendants in the lawsuit.  The parties will be responsible for their own attorneys' fees and costs arising from the lawsuit, with the costs of mediation in the proceeding to be shared equally by the USB Companies and The Cincinnati Insurance Company.

"We are very pleased with the settlement agreement that was reached with the insurance company," said Terry Phillips, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Security Bancshares, Inc.  "USBI has been very aggressive in pursuing all available recovery in connection with the ALC losses and thus far has been successful in doing so."

The settlement agreement concludes the lawsuit.  The USB Companies entered into the settlement agreement to avoid the expense and uncertainty of future litigation of the claims alleged in the lawsuit.

United Security Bancshares, Inc. is bank holding company that operates nineteen banking offices in Alabama through First United Security Bank.  In addition, the Company's operations include Acceptance Loan Company, Inc., a consumer loan company, and FUSB Reinsurance, Inc., an underwriter of credit life and credit accident and health insurance policies sold to the bank's and ALC's consumer loan customers.  The Company's stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "USBI."

SOURCE United Security Bancshares, Inc.

An international computer hacker pleaded guilty today to multiple charges relating to hacking activity and credit card fraud, announced Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division Lanny A. Breuer, Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Michael Loucks, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Benton J. Campbell and Director of the U.S. Secret Service Mark Sullivan. More than 40 million credit and debit card numbers were stolen from major U.S. retailers as a result of the hacking activity.

Albert Gonzalez, 28, of Miami, pleaded guilty today to 19 counts of conspiracy, computer fraud, wire fraud, access device fraud and aggravated identity theft relating to hacks into numerous major U.S. retailers including TJX Companies, BJ's Wholesale Club, OfficeMax, Boston Market, Barnes & Noble and Sports Authority. Gonzalez was indicted in August 2008 in the District of Massachusetts on charges related to these hacks.

Gonzalez also pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud relating to hacks into the Dave & Buster's restaurant chain, which were the subject of a May 2008 indictment in the Eastern District of New York. The pleas in both cases were entered before U.S. District Court Judge Patti B. Saris in federal court in Boston.

"Consumers must be able to trust that the credit and debit cards they use everyday in thousands of stores around the world are safe from unlawful access," said Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division. "Working together with U.S. Attorneys' Offices around the country and with the invaluable support of law enforcement agencies, we will continue our efforts to identify and prosecute hacking and credit card fraud."

"The investigation and prosecution of identity theft is a top priority of the Department," said Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Michael Loucks. "In the past 10 years there has been a dramatic growth in the transfer and storage of credit and debit card data on computer networks. It is thus compellingly important that we work hard to investigate and prosecute the theft of personal identity data that citizens entrust to computer networks every day."

"Computer hacking and identity theft pose serious risks to our commercial, personal and financial security," stated U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Benton J. Campbell. "Hackers, including those who commit their crimes from abroad, will find no refuge from the reach of U.S. criminal justice -- they will be found, prosecuted and convicted."

"Technology has forever changed the way we do business, virtually erasing geographic boundaries," said U.S. Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan. "However, this case demonstrates that even in the cyber world, there is no such thing as anonymity. The Secret Service, in conjunction with its many law enforcement partners across the United States and around the world, continues to successfully combat these crimes by adapting our investigative methodologies. We realize our success in this investigation is due in part to the cooperation of these partners in more than a dozen international law enforcement agencies."

According to the indictments to which Gonzalez pleaded guilty, he and his co-conspirators broke into retail credit card payment systems through a series of sophisticated techniques, including "wardriving" and installation of sniffer programs to capture credit and debit card numbers used at these retail stores. Wardriving involves driving around in a car with a laptop computer looking for accessible wireless computer networks of retailers. Using these techniques, Gonzalez and his co-conspirators were able to steal more than 40 million credit and debit card numbers from retailers. Also according to the indictments, Gonzalez and his co-conspirators sold the numbers to others for their fraudulent use and engaged in ATM fraud by encoding the data on the magnetic stripes of blank cards and withdrawing tens of thousands of dollars at a time from ATMs. According to the indictments, Gonzalez and his co-conspirators concealed and laundered their fraud proceeds by using anonymous Internet-based currencies both within the United States and abroad, and by channeling funds through bank accounts in Eastern Europe.

Based on the terms of the Boston plea agreement, Gonzalez faces a minimum of 15 years and a maximum of 25 years in prison. Based on the New York plea agreement, Gonzalez faces up to 20 years in prison, which the parties have agreed should run concurrently. He also faces a fine of up to twice the pecuniary gain, twice the victims' pecuniary loss or $250,000, whichever is greatest, per count for the Boston case and a maximum fine of $250,000 for the New York case. Gonzalez also agreed to an order of restitution for the loss suffered by his victims, and forfeiture of more than $2.7 million as well as multiple items of real estate and personal property, including a condo in Miami, a 2006 BMW 330i, a Tiffany diamond ring and Rolex watches. Included in the forfeited currency is more than $1 million in cash, which Gonzalez had buried in a container in his backyard. Sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 8, 2009.

Gonzalez remains under indictment for charges brought in August 2009 by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey of conspiring to hack into computer networks supporting major U.S. retail and financial organizations and steal credit and debit card numbers from those entities. Among the corporate victims named in that indictment are Heartland Payment Systems, a New Jersey-based card payment processor; 7-Eleven Inc., a Texas-based nationwide convenience store chain; and Hannaford Brothers Co. Inc., a Maine-based supermarket chain. Charges in that case remain pending. An indictment is merely an allegation and defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty in court. While Gonzalez has pleaded guilty to the Boston and New York charges, he has not pleaded guilty to charges pending in New Jersey and remains presumed innocent of those charges.

The Boston case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Stephen Heymann and Donald Cabell of the District of Massachusetts. The New York case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney William Campos of the Eastern District of New York, and Senior Counsel Kimberly Kiefer Peretti and Trial Attorney Evan Williams of the Criminal Division's Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. All of these cases are being investigated by the U.S. Secret Service.

Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice

A Connecticut Superior Court Judge has ordered UBS AG and UBS SECURITIES, LLC ("UBS") to pledge assets or post a bond in the amount of $35,573,904.53 within 10 days. The Court found "probable cause" that UBS used secret insider information obtained from its special relationship with the ratings agencies (Moody's and S&P) to commit securities fraud in the sale of Collateralized Debt Obligation ("CDO") Notes to a Connecticut hedge fund, Pursuit Partners.

In the 29-page opinion, Superior Court Judge John F. Blawie made several explosive findings, including:

• "Through direct and circumstantial evidence, Pursuit has established probable cause to sustain the validity of a claim that the UBS defendants were in possession of material nonpublic information regarding imminent ratings downgrades on the Notes it sold to the Plaintiffs, information UBS withheld from the Plaintiffs." Order, p. 28.
• "The use of the term 'triggerless', which was used by UBS to entice the Plaintiffs to purchase the same Notes they had earlier rejected, is akin to a representation by UBS that a gun being handed to the Plaintiff is not loaded, when in fact UBS knew the gun was not only loaded, but was about to go off." Order, p. 28.
• "The court takes UBS employees at their word when they referenced their Notes, these purported investment grade securities which they sold, as 'crap' and 'vomit', for UBS alone possessed the knowledge of what their product, their inventory, was truly worth. While UBS would argue that such descriptors lack a precise meaning, the true meaning of these words and the true value of UBS's wares became abundantly clear when the Plaintiffs' multi-million dollar investment was completely wiped out and liquidated by UBS shortly after the last of the Note purchases was consummated." Order, p. 28.
• "That is the difference between a risk that something might happen to change the value of an investment, which is both a fact of life and a risk shared by all parties to any securities transaction, and the undisclosed knowledge that something will happen. That type of nondisclosure, whether it is on the part of a seller or a buyer, can cross the line into actionable securities fraud, and the court finds probable cause to sustain a finding that in this instance, it did." Order, p. 28.
• "On July 11, 2007, the day that Moody's publicly announced it was putting 184 CDO tranches on review for possible downgrade, Morelli [head of the UBS syndicate desk] sent an email simply stating 'put today in your calendar.' In explaining the context of that email, the significance of that day was described to the court by Morelli as, 'Today was essentially the beginning of the end of the CDO business, meaning the bonds were getting downgraded, they were probably going to get downgraded further and we [UBS] were going to lose a lot of money.'" Order, pp. 17-18.
• "UBS failed to disclose and actively concealed the fact that based upon this change, the Notes being marketed by UBS would not maintain their investment grade rating, and would lose a significant amount of value, if not the liquidation of the entire investment." Order, p. 18.
  

The Court's Order was issued at the conclusion of a one-week hearing. The Court took testimony of various UBS employees and reviewed documents, including internal email communications within UBS, and among UBS and the ratings agencies. The evidence showed that UBS was given a private "head's up" that the ratings agencies' ratings were false, and that catastrophic downgrades were imminent months before they actually occurred. UBS had moved to dismiss all of Pursuit's claims at the same hearing, and that motion was denied as to most of the claims in a 66-page order issued by the Court earlier this Summer.

The Plaintiff, Pursuit Partners, is a Connecticut investment fund represented by the national trial firm of Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh and Jardine, P.C. Burg Simpson has its main office in Englewood, Colorado, and is currently at the national forefront of securities litigation arising out of the 2007 CDO market collapse.

About the order, lead trial counsel Michael S. Burg said "This historic decision is what we believe is the first of many that will reveal the truth as to how American investors suffered hundreds of billions of dollars in losses due to the egregious acts of the world's largest banks and the rating agencies."

"We at Burg Simpson understand that this is only the beginning of a long hard fight," said co-trial counsel David K. TeSelle. "We are committed to this fight for as long as it takes to rightfully compensate those who trusted the banks and the rating agencies, and as a result of the breach of that trust, suffered significant losses in their retirement accounts, college funds and life's savings. It is the right thing to do."

SOURCE Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh & Jardine, P.C.

Hansruedi Schumacher and Matthias Rickenbach, both of Switzerland, were indicted today for conspiring to defraud the United States, the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced. According to the indictment, Schumacher worked as an executive manager at Neue Zuercher Bank (NZB), a Swiss private bank located in Zurich, Switzerland. Rickenbach worked as a Swiss attorney who provided legal advice and services to U.S. clients. Both are alleged to have aided wealthy Americans conceal assets and income in Switzerland from United States authorities.

According to the indictment, Schumacher and Rickenbach helped wealthy American clients conceal their assets by establishing sham and nominee offshore entities to hide their U.S. clients' assets and income while allowing these clients to still control the assets and make investment decisions.

The indictment further alleges that Schumacher and Rickenbach regularly traveled to the United States to conduct banking and investment activities with their U.S. clients and that when they traveled they concealed their business activities in the United States by falsely representing to American authorities that they were traveling to the U.S. for personal reasons. While in the United States, the defendants would sometimes bring cash for their clients..

According to court documents, Schumacher and Rickenbach aided their wealthy American clients repatriate money back to the United States using several deceptive means. Schumacher and Rickenbach helped their clients obtain offshore credit cards and created sham loan documents. Additionally, Schumacher and Rickenbach falsified bank documents to generate the appearance that assets of their U.S. clients belonged to Swiss citizens, and they falsified documents to disguise their United States clients' repatriation of offshore funds as inheritances from foreign citizens.

According to court documents, Schumacher and Rickenbach discouraged their U.S. clients from voluntarily coming into compliance in the United States. Instead, the defendants encouraged their clients to transfer their assets from UBS, a large Swiss bank, to NZB, a smaller bank in Switzerland. The defendants told their clients that their assets and identification would be safer at NZB because they had no presence in the United States and was therefore less likely to be pressured by the American authorities to disclose the identities of their United States clients.

"The Justice Department will continue to investigate leads provided by U.S. taxpayers who have come forward to disclose foreign bank accounts and will prosecute those foreign bankers and banks who illegally helped U.S. clients evade taxes," said John A. DiCicco, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Tax Division. "We encourage foreign banks to come forward and disclose their conduct immediately, before we learn about their criminal conduct from U.S. taxpayers."

"Today's Indictment is the latest prosecution in this District against foreign bankers and professionals who enabled and assisted wealthy Americans conceal their assets offshore," said Jeffrey H. Sloman, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. "As more Americans voluntarily come into compliance and face their financial obligations, more leads are being developed and new investigations are initiated. American taxpayers who sought to avoid taxes by hiding their assets in Swiss accounts are on notice that this investigation continues."

"This is another step in our ongoing effort to pursue hidden offshore assets -- no matter where they are located," said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. "We're in the early stages of our work to crack down on offshore tax evasion. Through our efforts, we are gaining access to more and more information on institutions and individuals involved in offshore tax evasion, and you can expect us to use all of our enforcement tools to stop this abuse. For people with hidden offshore assets, they have an opportunity to get right with the government. Time is quickly running out, and people should take advantage of our voluntary disclosure process before special provisions expire September 23."

Acting Assistant Attorney General DiCicco and Acting U.S. Attorney Sloman commended the investigative efforts of the IRS agents involved in this case. The prosecution is being handled by Senior Litigation Counsel Kevin M. Downing and Trial Attorney Michael P. Ben'Ary of the Tax Division, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey A. Neiman.

U.S. citizens who have an interest in, or signature or other authority over, a financial account in a foreign country with assets in excess of $10,000 are required to disclose the existence of such account on Schedule B, Part III of their individual income tax return. Additionally, American citizens must file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, or F-Bar, with the U.S. Treasury, disclosing any financial account in a foreign country with assets in excess of $10,000 for which they have a financial interest in or signature authority, or other authority over.

Source: US Dept. of Justice

The U.S. Department of Labor has obtained a consent judgment and order requiring the former president of Chicago-based AA Capital Partners Inc. to restore $50 million in losses to five Michigan pension funds as restitution for misuse of the plans' assets to benefit the investment firm and himself. The judgment also bars defendant John Orecchio from serving in a fiduciary or service provider capacity to any employee benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

"Fiduciaries have a legal obligation to ensure plan assets are used only to pay benefits and reasonable expenses of a plan. Those who violate that trust will be held accountable for their actions," said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis.

Although Orecchio has submitted proof of current inability to make restitution, the consent judgment requires him to submit annual financial statements to the Labor Department and to pay off the judgment as funds are received by him.

The Labor Department filed a lawsuit on April 10, 2008 against AA Capital Partners, its co-owner and president Orecchio, chief financial officer Mary Elizabeth Stevens, and affiliate AA Capital Liquidity Management, LLC for allegedly misusing plan assets and charging the plans excessive fees on investments. In July 2008, the department filed an amended complaint adding an additional count which alleged that plan assets were imprudently invested in a limited partnership created to invest in Xyience Inc., a Nevada corporation which manufactures and sells food, vitamins and beverages, even though a prudent investigation had not been conducted with respect to this investment strategy.

The pension plans that suffered losses as a result of Orecchio's actions covered more than 60,000 participants of the Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of Detroit and Vicinity, Operating Engineers Local No. 324 Pension Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Millwrights' Local No. 1102 Supplemental Pension Fund, and Michigan Teamsters Joint Council #43 Pension Fund. As of April 30, 2006, the pension plans had total assets of approximately $3.1 billion.

At various times from 2002 to 2006, the defendants allegedly improperly used $25.9 million of the plans' assets to pay for, among other things, the operating expenses of the firm, renovations to a horse farm, and a strip club owned by Orecchio. In addition, they caused the plans to pay unauthorized fees to AA Capital.

AA Capital is a registered investment advisory firm to employee benefit plans, including ERISA-covered benefit plans. The firm created AA Capital Liquidity Management as the general partner for a fund that invested in real estate loans and entities that developed real property. In 2006, AA Capital was placed in the hands of a court-appointed receiver.

The Chicago Regional Office of the Labor Department's Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) investigated this case. The suit was filed in federal district court in Chicago. Employers and workers can contact the Chicago office at 312-353-0900 or EBSA's toll-free number, 866-444-3272, for help with problems relating to private-sector health and pension plans.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor

The following remarks were issued today by Attorney General Eric Holder:

Good morning and thank you for inviting me to join you today. It is a pleasure to be here among friends and colleagues, many of whom I've had the distinct pleasure of working with over the last 30 years during my time in the Department. There are too many familiar faces in the room to begin naming names, but as I have said many times in the last six months, it is great to be back.

These Leadership Conferences always present a great opportunity for us to learn from one another and for the Department to recognize your many significant accomplishments. This year's conference is even more special, as 2009 marks the 25th year of the Asset Forfeiture Program. I am very pleased to join you in this Silver Anniversary celebration, and I share your pride in the Asset Forfeiture Program's quarter-century of success.

I am also proud to be here today to honor the OCDETF Program, which is now in its 27th year. The OCDETF strategy recognizes that the most effective way to fight sophisticated criminal organizations is by leveraging the strengths, resources, and expertise of federal, state and local investigative and prosecutorial agencies. The OCDETF Program does this through the formation of prosecutor-led, multi-agency task forces that successfully target drug traffickers through cutting edge, intelligence-based analysis and investigative work.

Working together, the OCDETF and Asset Forfeiture Programs have a proven track record of destroying drug trafficking organizations by arresting and prosecuting their leadership and by seizing their financial infrastructure. I am delighted to be here today with the leaders of these great programs.

I'd like to begin by talking about OCDETF, which truly is the strategic centerpiece of the Department's counter-narcotics effort. When I served as United States Attorney, I was fortunate to lead the OCDETF effort here in Washington, DC, and experienced first-hand the field-level effectiveness of the Program. Later, as Deputy Attorney General, I saw just how powerful the OCDETF model could be on a nationwide basis. Now, as Attorney General, I am proud to support your continued success. Through your constant innovation and steadfast commitment to cooperation with our state and local partners, you have enhanced immeasurably our nation's counter-narcotics capabilities.

Two examples of OCDETF's innovative and cooperative approach demonstrate the effectiveness of the OCDETF strategy: (1) the establishment of the OCDETF Fusion Center; and (2) the creation of permanent, co-located OCDETF Strike Forces.

The OCDETF Fusion Center was established to address a pressing need for reliable, in-depth intelligence -- from both human and electronic sources -- to target and attack sophisticated international drug trafficking and money laundering organizations. Building on the OCDETF philosophy of cooperation and information-sharing, the Fusion Center brings together into a common database the unfiltered investigative information of each OCDETF member agency. Known as "Compass," this database allows analysts to connect investigative information from multiple agencies and to provide real-time analysis to agents and prosecutors in the field. The Fusion Center works in concert with the DEA-led Multi-Agency Special Operations Division to provide the most complete intelligence picture of criminal organizations currently available to U.S. law enforcement.

In recognition of the Fusion Center's effectiveness and the value of the Compass database, the International Organized Crime Intelligence and Operations Center -- or "IOC-2," as it is known -- recently entered into a partnership with the OCDETF Fusion Center. The IOC-2 will add important new data sources to the Compass database as well as new analysts into the OCDETF Fusion Center. Through this partnership, we will broaden our capability to attack organized crime in all its forms.

A second illustration of OCDETF's success is the creation of permanent, co-located OCDETF Strike Forces in Boston, New York, Atlanta, Tampa, San Juan, Houston, Phoenix, San Diego -- and soon in El Paso. Because they are both permanent and co-located, these strike forces foster close working relationships across agencies and facilitate multiple, wide-reaching, and highly effective multi-agency investigations. Moreover, these Strike Forces have taken innovative steps to leverage non-OCDETF resources to their great advantage. For example, working with the Asset Forfeiture Fund, OCDETF and the National Drug Intelligence Center have begun to place Document and Media Exploitation Teams in the Atlanta and Houston Strike Forces. These DOMEX teams allow Strike Force analysts and agents to capture and exploit evidence in complex, fast-paced investigations, and to develop trial exhibits for prosecutors quickly and effectively. We look forward to adding DOMEX teams to other co-located strike forces in the near future, beginning with those along the Southwest Border.

Collaborative and innovative efforts such as the OCDETF Fusion Center and the OCDETF Strike Forces are critically important if we are to succeed in our efforts to combat international drug traffickers and money launderers. The criminal organizations that OCDETF targets are as sophisticated as they are ruthless. Indeed, some of these groups have even aligned themselves with terrorist organizations. We have seen that Mexican drug cartels in particular, pose both a national security threat to Mexico and an organized crime threat to the United States. The cartels send seemingly endless supplies of cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, marijuana and other illicit drugs across our borders and onto our streets. They operate seamlessly across local, state, and national boundaries. To combat this threat, we must also be seamless in our operations.

I know that all of you are up to the challenge. Since the inception of the Consolidated Priority Organization Target (or "CPOT") List in 2002, your OCDETF investigations have dismantled 39 CPOT organizations and have disrupted 20 more. Further, you have dismantled or disrupted more than 1,160 CPOT-linked organizations. The success of your operations is impressive, but not surprising. We can expect to achieve these kinds of results when we work together in innovative ways.

Together with OCDETF, the Asset Forfeiture Program has made, and continues to make, a critical difference in the fight against crime. Through your work, the Asset Forfeiture Program provides vitally important funding for law enforcement as well as resources that can be invested in community-changing programs such as "Weed and Seed." And of course, by seizing criminals' assets, you reduce the incentive to commit crime by taking money out of the hands of dangerous drug dealers and terrorists -- money that now works for law enforcement.

As with the OCDETF Program, the success of the Asset Forfeiture Program is a direct result of your hard work and your unfailing commitment to cooperation and collaboration at all levels and across all organizational lines. As Deputy Attorney General, it was my privilege to testify before Congress in support of asset forfeiture legislation. In that testimony, I emphasized the critical role that asset forfeiture plays not only in the fight against illegal drugs, but in the broader fight against other types of crime. Almost ten years to the day since that testimony -- and, appropriately, on the 25th anniversary of the Asset Forfeiture Program -- I am proud to say that the Asset Forfeiture Program remains a critical part of the Department's efforts to reduce and deter criminal activity.

Since 1984, more than $13 billion in net federal forfeiture proceeds have been deposited into the Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund. During this same period, more than $4.5 billion has been equitably shared with more than 8,000 state and local law enforcement agencies nationwide, thereby supplementing their constrained resources without further taxing the public. Once left with no real opportunity to recover their losses, crime victims are now recouping greater sums than ever before. Approximately $500 million in payments have been paid to more 39,000 victims in fiscal year 2008 alone.

Yet, the impact of forfeiture is greater than just money. When we look back on the last 25 years of the program, we see a forfeiture regime that has been transformed from a collection of centuries-old laws designed to fight pirates, enforce customs laws and fight illegal contraband, into an array of modern law enforcement tools designed to combat 21st century criminals both at home and abroad. We now have the ability to deprive global criminals of their ill-gotten gains, to seize the instrumentalities of their trade, and to use the power of asset forfeiture to destroy their illegal enterprises.

Operation Honor Student, a case that will be honored here later tonight, illustrates the power of asset forfeiture and its devastating effect on organized criminal activity. In that case, a task force led by the Rhode Island U.S. Attorney's Office, the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section of the Criminal Division, and the Food and Drug Administration's Office of Criminal Investigations obtained the forfeiture of $2.7 million from the accounts of GeneScience, one of the largest biopharmaceutical companies in China that had been involved in the illegal distribution of Human Growth Hormone into the United States. To accomplish this forfeiture, the task force employed a new statutory vehicle -- 18 U.S.C. section 981(k) -- which permitted the Government to seize the funds, physically located in China, from the corresponding accounts of Chinese banks in New York. This was the first use of section 981(k), enacted as part of the USA Patriot Act, against a Chinese entity, and its success has helped pave the way for subsequent investigations using this groundbreaking authority.

But not to minimize these impressive legal results, the true impact of Operation Honor Student lies in its practical effect on the illegal hGH market in the United States. Task force agents estimate that at the time of the investigation, GeneScience manufactured approximately 90% of the hGH being illegally sold and distributed in the United States. As a direct result of this seizure, GeneScience has stopped all shipments to the United States. So, through the use of a section 981(k) seizure, we were able to eliminate a supplier that represented 90% of an illegal drug market. Ninety percent.

Asset forfeiture plays a critical role not only in drug cases, but across the law enforcement spectrum -- from national security investigations, to securities fraud cases, to healthcare scams. And, of course, we cannot forget the most important -- and sometimes least heralded -- purposes of our Asset Forfeiture Program -- which is to make a meaningful difference in the lives crime victims by recovering stolen funds and property and returning them to their rightful owners.

When we look at the successes of both the Asset Forfeiture Program and the OCDETF Program, I cannot help but think about the possibilities, and challenges, for the next 25 years of these vitally important initiatives. While we have made great strides, international drug traffickers and money launderers continue to threaten our country. Criminal enterprises and terrorist networks continue to misuse our financial system for nefarious purposes. We can and we must do more. I am confident that under the leadership of those assembled here today, we will succeed.

The analysts, agents, and prosecutors of the OCDETF and Asset Forfeiture Programs are among the most talented and dedicated professionals in all of law enforcement. You protect this country day in and day out from the scourge of drugs and violence, and you do it with professionalism, creativity, and passion. I am proud to lead the Department of Justice, and am proud of each of you. Thank you for all that you do. Keep up the great work.

Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice

Tax return preparer Lawrence Sperling pleaded guilty today to aiding in the preparation of false tax returns, the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced. Sperling was scheduled to begin trial on April 14, 2009 before Judge Deborah Chasanow in Greenbelt, Md.

According to the indictment and the plea agreement, Sperling, who is a disbarred former attorney, owned and operated a tax preparation business in Silver Spring, Md., from at least 2002 through 2003. The business operated under several names, including American Tax Service, American Tax Institute, JAMAR LLC, and American Tax Professional Associates Inc. (ATPA).

According to the indictment and the plea agreement, Sperling knowingly prepared tax returns for his clients that contained false and fraudulent items, including inflated medial expenses, charitable contributions, miscellaneous employment-related expenses, and child care credits. The tax loss associated with false returns prepared by Sperling is $804,335.

According to the indictment and the plea agreement, beginning in 1988, Sperling failed to file tax returns for eleven years. In 2001, the IRS penalized Sperling and fined him $10,000 for "willful or reckless understatement of taxpayer's tax liability" with respect to his tax preparation business. The IRS sent him more than two dozen notices of taxes and penalties due, notice of intent to levy, and other warning letters.

Beginning in at least 1998, Sperling arranged for another individual (the nominee) to file the tax returns of Sperling's clients and to collect Sperling's preparation fees. The nominee subsequently held these funds in bank accounts in the nominee's name. The nominee made disbursements of these funds to Sperling or others at Sperling's request. Sperling never declared or paid taxes on these funds, although he used a portion of them to pay business expenses. As a result of this conduct, Sperling caused an additional tax loss of $130,847.

Judge Chasanow scheduled sentencing of Sperling for July 31, 2009. Sperling faces a maximum sentence of three years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for the aiding in the preparation of false returns conviction.

Acting Assistant Attorney General John A. DiCicco thanked the special agents from IRS-Criminal Investigation who investigated the case, as well as Tax Division trial attorneys Jerrod Patterson, Shawn Noud, and Tino Lisella, who prosecuted the case.

SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice

- Lawsuit alleges breach of contract by MGM based upon MGM's SEC filing that there is "substantial doubt" about its ability "to continue as a going concern" -

- Infinity World requests declaratory relief from obligations under the joint venture agreement as a result of MGM's breach -

- Lawsuit intended to ensure CityCenter's long term viability and financial strength -

Dubai World today announced that its subsidiary Infinity World, which is a joint venture partner with MGM for the development of the CityCenter development project, has filed a lawsuit against MGM in Delaware Chancery Court to protect its rights and the best interests of the CityCenter project.

The lawsuit alleges that MGM's admissions in its 10-K filed with the SEC on March 17 constitute a breach of the CityCenter joint venture agreement and puts the CityCenter development project at risk. Specifically, and amongst other Risk Factors, MGM stated in its 10-K filing that "There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern".

MGM also said it "cannot provide assurance" that its business would generate sufficient cash flow from operation or that future borrowings would be available to it under its senior credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable it to pay its indebtedness or to fund its other liquidity needs.

In its court filing today, Infinity World asked for a declaratory judgment and other measures that would relieve Infinity World of its obligations under the joint venture agreement resulting from MGM's breach.

CityCenter is a mixed-use luxury residential, resort and retail complex being developed by MGM on 67 acres between the Bellagio and Monte Carlo resorts on the Las Vegas Strip. It is owned by CityCenter Holdings LLC, a joint venture equally owned by MGM and Infinity World. The complex, scheduled to open in late 2009, has been under construction since 2005.

Dubai World said MGM's disclosure that it cannot provide assurance that it will be able to meet its future payment obligations to CityCenter has left it no other option but to act to protect its investment and the future of CityCenter. The current path of the project is simply unsustainable given our partner's financial troubles, it said.

Furthermore, the company said, MGM has mismanaged the CityCenter project, resulting in costs significantly over budget despite downsizing certain of the facilities. This has caused Infinity World to make capital contributions far in excess of the levels originally estimated by MGM.

Essentially it is being asked to pay significantly more and getting less, with only uncertainty about MGM's future, Dubai World said.

In August 2007, MGM provided an estimate of $7.488 billion to complete CityCenter. MGM has since increased that estimate by approximately $1.3 billion, to $8.8 billion. MGM anticipated a financing package of $5 billion, subsequently revised it to $3 billion, and then ultimately raised only $1.8 billion. Infinity World's contributions to CityCenter to date have equaled approximately $4.3 billion.

Ultimately, Dubai World continues to believe that the CityCenter project has enormous value and will eventually reap tremendous benefits for the Las Vegas community and its investors. It said it is committed to working closely with MGM and the project lenders to resolve these issues in an orderly way. Ensuring completion of the project on acceptable terms is why Dubai World is taking the actions it is announcing today.

In its 10-K filing with the SEC, MGM stated that it obtained a waiver of financial covenants through May 15, 2009 from its senior lenders. According to loan agreements and the waiver, after that date those lenders reserve the right to declare MGM to be in default. The 10-K stated that if the lenders exercise any or all such rights, MGM or CityCenter may determine to seek relief through a filing under the US Bankruptcy Code. Dubai World does not believe the short term waiver will benefit CityCenter in the long term and is significantly concerned about MGM's survival.

SOURCE Dubai World

Fannie Mae Left Holding Nearly $44 Million in Unpaid Principal in Refinanced Mortgage Loans

Benton J. Campbell, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, announced that Leib Pinter, 64, a former executive of Olympia Mortgage Corp., was sentenced today to 97 months in prison for orchestrating a scheme to defraud Fannie Mae in connection with mortgage loans that Fannie Mae owned, but were refinanced through Olympia.

Pinter was also ordered to pay more than $43 million in restitution to the victims of his fraud scheme. The sentencing proceeding was held before U.S. District Judge Sandra L. Townes at the U.S. Courthouse in Brooklyn, and followed Pinter's plea of guilty to a wire fraud conspiracy on Sept. 11, 2008.

Olympia, formerly headquartered in Brooklyn, originated and serviced mortgage loans owned by Fannie Mae. When Olympia refinanced a Fannie Mae mortgage loan, Fannie Mae typically wire transferred the money to an Olympia bank account. Olympia was then required to pay off the underlying mortgage loan by remitting the outstanding balance to Fannie Mae. Instead, Pinter misappropriated these proceeds for the benefit of Olympia. When the fraudulent scheme was revealed, Fannie Mae held nearly $44 million in unpaid principal in refinanced mortgage loans.

"The defendant took advantage of his relationship with Fannie Mae to enrich himself and others," said U.S. Attorney Campbell. "This case is yet another example of the Justice Department's swift and vigorous response to those who have corrupted our nation's lending practices." Mr. Campbell expressed his grateful appreciation to the FBI's New York Field Office, which led the government's investigation. In May 2008, Mr. Campbell announced the formation of a task force comprised of federal, state and local law enforcement agents and investigators to address the burgeoning problem of mortgage fraud.

The government's case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jonathan E. Green and Daniel A. Spector.

SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice

Lev L. Dassin, the Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Joseph M. Demarest Jr., the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the FBI's New York Field Division, announced today that David G. Friehling, the accountant for Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC (BLMIS), surrendered this morning on a criminal complaint charging him with securities fraud, aiding and abetting investment adviser fraud, and four counts of filing false audit reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

As alleged in the complaint unsealed today in Manhattan federal court:

Friehling is a CPA licensed by the State of New York and is the sole practitioner at Friehling & Horowitz, CPAs, P.C. (F&H).

BLMIS was required, under federal securities laws and regulations, to file annual certified audited financial statements with the SEC and to distribute parts of such statements to clients.

From 1991 through 2008, F&H was the accounting firm retained by BLMIS purportedly to audit BLMIS's financial statements. Friehling created BLMIS' certified and purportedly audited financial statements, including balance sheets, statements of income, statements of cash flows and reports on internal control. Friehling falsely certified that he had prepared such statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) and in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Those financial statements were filed with the SEC and sent to clients of BLMIS. BLMIS paid Friehling approximately $12,000 to $14,500 per month for his services between 2004 and 2007.

Friehling failed to conduct audits that complied with GAAS and GAAP by, among other things, failing to: (a) conduct independent verification of BLMIS assets; (b) review material sources of BLMIS revenue, including commissions; (c) examine a bank account through which billions of dollars of BLMIS client funds flowed; (d) verify liabilities related to BLMIS client accounts; or (e) verify the purchase and custody of securities by BLMIS. Friehling also failed to test internal controls as required under GAAP and GAAS standards. For example, Friehling did not take any steps to test internal controls over areas such as BLMIS' redemption of client funds, the payment of invoices for corporate expenses, or the purchase of securities by BLMIS on behalf of its clients. Further, commencing at least as far back as 1995, Friehling did not maintain professional independence from his audit client, BLMIS. Specifically, Friehling and/or his wife had an account at BLMIS with a year-end net equity of more than $500,000 -- the maximum amount that, under SEC rules, he could have invested with a broker-dealer client and still maintain his independence.

The charges and allegations contained in the complaint are merely accusations and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Friehling, 49, faces a statutory maximum sentence of 105 years in prison. He will be presented later today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz in Manhattan federal court.

"Mr. Friehling is charged with crimes that represent a serious breach of the investing public's trust," said Acting U.S. Attorney Lev L. Dassin. "Although Mr. Friehling is not charged with knowledge of the Madoff Ponzi scheme, he is charged with deceiving investors by falsely certifying that he audited the financial statements of Mr. Madoff's business. Mr. Friehling's deception helped foster the illusion that Mr. Madoff legitimately invested his clients' money."

Mr. Dassin added, "Our investigation is continuing."

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Joseph M. Demarest stated: "David Friehling was retained and paid by Bernard Madoff to provide accounting services to his firm, but as a purportedly independent auditor, Friehling had a fiduciary responsibility to investors, and a legal obligation to regulators to report the truth. The charges unsealed today make clear that Friehling did not fulfill those duties. He did little or no testing, no verification of the 'facts' he certified. His job was not merely to rubber-stamp statements he didn't verify. Simply put, Friehling failed to do his job, and lied to investors and regulators in saying he did."

Mr. Dassin praised the investigative work of the FBI and thanked the SEC and the Rockland County District Attorney's Office for their assistance.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marc Litt, Lisa A. Baroni, William J. Stellmach, Barbara A. Ward and Sharon Frase are in charge of the prosecution.

SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice